The hoax was his way of calling attention to this decline. In his article, Sokal attacks "the dogma imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual outlook" that there is an external world governed by laws of nature which we can understand imperfectly using the scientific method In the late s, Alan Sokal, a professor of physics at New York University, began a soon-to-be-infamous article by setting out some of his core beliefs: that there exists an external world Estimated Reading Time: 9 mins The editors of Social Text did not detect that Sokal's article was a hoax, and they published it in the journal's Spring/Summer issue.1 The hoax was revealed by Sokal in an article for another journal, Lingua Franca;2 he explained that his Social Text article had been "liberally salted with nonsense," and in his opinion was accepted only because "(a) it sounded good and
Sokal affair - Wikipedia
The Sokal affairalso called the Sokal hoax[1] was a demonstrative scholarly hoax performed by Alan Sokala physics professor at New York University and University College London. InSokal submitted an article to Social Textan academic journal of postmodern cultural studies. The submission was an experiment to test the journal's intellectual rigorand specifically to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies—whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross —[would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if a it sounded good alan sokal hoax essay b it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions.
It proposed that quantum gravity is a social and linguistic construct. At that time, the journal did not practice academic peer review and it did not submit the article for outside expert review by a physicist. The hoax caused controversy about the scholarly merit of commentary on the physical sciences by those in the humanities; the influence of postmodern philosophy on social disciplines in general; academic ethics, including whether Sokal was wrong to deceive the editors and readers of Social Text ; and whether Social Text had exercised appropriate intellectual rigor.
In an interview on the U. radio program All Things ConsideredSokal said he was inspired to submit the bogus article after reading Higher Superstitionin which authors Paul R.
Gross and Norman Levitt claim that some alan sokal hoax essay journals will publish anything as long as it has "the proper leftist thought" and quoted or was written by well-known leftist thinkers. Gross and Levitt had been defenders of the philosophy of scientific realismopposing postmodernist academics who questioned scientific objectivity, alan sokal hoax essay.
They asserted that anti-intellectual sentiment in liberal arts departments especially English departments caused the increase of deconstructionist thought, which eventually resulted in a deconstructionist critique of science.
They saw the critique as a "repertoire of rationalizations" for avoiding the study of science. Sokal reasoned that if the presumption of editorial laziness was correct, the nonsensical content of his article would be irrelevant to whether the editors would publish it.
What would matter would be ideological obsequiousness, fawning references to deconstructionist writers, and sufficient quantities of the appropriate jargon. After the article was published and the hoax revealed, he wrote:. The results of my little experiment demonstrate, at the very least, that some fashionable sectors of the American academic Left have been getting intellectually lazy. The editors of Social Text liked my article because they liked its conclusion: that "the content and methodology of postmodern science provide powerful intellectual support for the progressive political project" [sec, alan sokal hoax essay.
They apparently felt no need to analyze the quality of the evidence, the cogency of the arguments, or even the relevance of the arguments to the purported conclusion. A morphogenetic field is a concept adapted by Rupert Sheldrake in a way that Sokal characterized in the affair's aftermath as "a bizarre New Age idea. After referring skeptically to the "so-called scientific method", the article declared that "it is becoming increasingly apparent that physical 'reality ' " is fundamentally "a social and linguistic construct.
Moreover, the article's footnotes conflate academic terms with sociopolitical rhetoric, alan sokal hoax essay, e. Just as liberal feminists are frequently content with a minimal agenda of legal and social equality for women and " pro-choice ", so liberal and even some socialist mathematicians are often content to work within the hegemonic Zermelo—Fraenkel framework which, reflecting its nineteenth-century liberal origins, already incorporates the axiom of equality supplemented only by the axiom of choice.
Sokal submitted the article to Social Textwhose editors were collecting articles for the "Science Wars" issue. In the May issue of Lingua Francain the article "A Physicist Experiments With Cultural Studies", Sokal revealed that "Transgressing the Boundaries" was a hoax and concluded that Social Text "felt comfortable publishing an article on quantum physics without bothering to consult anyone knowledgeable in the subject" because of its ideological proclivities and editorial bias.
In their defense, Social Text 's editors said they believed that Sokal's essay "was the earnest attempt of a professional scientist to seek some kind of affirmation from postmodern philosophy for developments in his field" and that "its status as parody does not alter, substantially, our interest in the piece, itself, as a symptomatic document. Sokal said the editors' response demonstrated the problem that he sought to identify.
Social Textas an academic journal, published the article not because it was faithful, true, and accurate to its subject, but because an "academic authority" had written it and because of the appearance of the obscure writing. The editors said they considered it poorly written but published it because they felt Sokal was an academic seeking their intellectual affirmation.
Sokal remarked:. My goal isn't to defend science from the barbarian hordes of lit crit we'll survive just alan sokal hoax essay, thank youbut to defend the Left from a trendy segment of itself. There are hundreds of important political and economic issues surrounding science and technology.
Sociology of science, at its best, has done much to clarify these issues. But sloppy sociology, like sloppy science, is useless, or even counterproductive, alan sokal hoax essay. Social Text' s response revealed that none of the editors had suspected Sokal's piece was a parody, alan sokal hoax essay. Instead, they speculated Sokal's admission "represented a change of heart, or a folding of his intellectual resolve. In the second paragraph I declare without the slightest evidence or argument, that "physical 'reality' note the scare quotes [ Fair enough.
Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the windows of my apartment.
I live on the twenty-first floor. InSokal and Jean Bricmont co-wrote Impostures intellectuelles US: Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science ; UK: Intellectual Impostures InSokal published a followup book, Beyond the Hoaxwhich revisited the history of the hoax and discussed its lasting implications, alan sokal hoax essay.
As Sokal revealed the hoax, French philosopher Jacques Alan sokal hoax essay was initially one of the objects of discredit in the United States, particularly in newspaper coverage. weekly magazine used two images of him, a photo and a caricatureto illustrate a "dossier" on the Sokal article. He called Sokal's action "sad" for having trivialized Sokal's mathematical work and "ruining the chance to carefully examine controversies" about scientific objectivity.
Derrida then faulted him and Bricmont for what he considered "an act of intellectual bad faith " in their follow-up book, Impostures intellectuelles : they had published two articles almost simultaneously, one in English in The Times Literary Supplement on 17 October [19] and one in French in Libération on 18—19 October[20] but while the two articles were almost identical, they differed in how they treated Derrida.
The English-language article had a list of French intellectuals who were not included in Sokal's and Bricmont's book: "Such well-known thinkers as AlthusserBarthesand Foucault —who, as readers alan sokal hoax essay the TLS will be well aware, have always had their supporters and detractors on both sides of the Channel—appear in our book only in a minor role, alan sokal hoax essay, as cheerleaders for the texts we criticize.
Derrida may also have been sensitive to another difference between the French and English versions of Impostures intellectuelles. In the French, his citation from the original hoax article is said to be an "isolated" instance of abuse, [21] whereas the English text adds a parenthetical remark that Derrida's work contained "no systematic misuse or indeed attention to science.
Sociologist Stephen Hilgartner, chairman of Cornell University 's science and technology studies department, wrote "The Sokal Affair in Context"[26] comparing Sokal's hoax to "Confirmational Response: Bias Among Social Work Journals"an article by William M. Though much more systematic than Sokal's work, it received scant media attention.
Hilgartner argued that the "asymmetric" effect of the successful Sokal hoax compared with Epstein's experiment cannot be attributed to its quality, but that "[t]hrough a mechanism that resembles confirmatory bias, audiences may apply less stringent standards of evidence and ethics to attacks on targets that they are predisposed to regard unfavorably.
Hilgartner also argued that Sokal's hoax reinforced the views of well-known pundits such as George Will and Rush Limbaughso that his opinions were amplified by media outlets predisposed to agree with his argument. The Sokal Affair extended from academia to the public press. Anthropologist Bruno Latourcriticized in Fashionable Nonsensedescribed the scandal as a "tempest in a teacup. In Social Studies of ScienceBricmont and Sokal responded to Stolzenberg, [31] denouncing his alan sokal hoax essay of their work and criticizing his commentary about the " strong programme " of the sociology of science.
Stolzenberg replied in the same issue that their critique and allegations of misrepresentation were based on misreadings, alan sokal hoax essay. He advised readers to slowly and skeptically examine the arguments of each party, bearing in mind that "the obvious is sometimes the enemy of the true. InCornell sociologist Robb Willer performed an experiment in which undergraduate students read Sokal's paper and were told either that it was written by another student or that it was by a famous academic.
He found that students who believed the paper's author was a high-status intellectual rated it better in quality and intelligibility. InJames A. LindsayPeter Boghossianand Helen Pluckrose initiated "The Grievance Studies affair", alan sokal hoax essay, a project to create bogus academic papers on cultural, queer, race, gender, fat, and sexuality studies and submit them to academic journals, alan sokal hoax essay.
Their intent was to expose problems in "grievance studies", a term they apply to a subcategory of these academic alan sokal hoax essay in which "poor science is undermining the real and important work being done elsewhere". The hoax began in and continued intowhen it was halted after one of the papers caught the attention of journalists, who quickly found its purported author, Helen Wilson, to be nonexistent.
By that time, four of the 20 papers had been published, three had been accepted but not yet published, alan sokal hoax essay, six had been rejected, alan sokal hoax essay seven were still under review.
One of the published papers had won special recognition, alan sokal hoax essay. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Not to be confused with the Sokol affair involving the company Berkshire Hathaway. Main article: Fashionable Nonsense. Main article: Grievance Studies affair. Academese Bogdanov affair — French academic dispute Grievance studies affair Chip Morningstara software developer known for his early alan sokal hoax essay involving postmodern deconstruction at the 2nd International Conference on Cyberspace in Dr.
Fox effect — In educational psychology, named after the identity Dr. Myron L. Fox, alan sokal hoax essay, an actor gave a lecture to a group of experts with almost no content but was alan sokal hoax essay List of scholarly publishing stings — List of nonsense alan sokal hoax essay that were accepted by an academic journal or conference Paper generator — Software which creates a fake academic paper Postmodernism Generator — Computer program, a program that produces imitations of postmodernist writing.
Gross and Norman Levitt's Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels With Science Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, Gross and Levitt argued that the success of getting published in postmodern journals was based not on the quality of the work but rather on its "academic leanings — papers displaying the proper leftist thought, especially if written by or quoting well known authors, were being published in spite of their low quality Demersp.
Lingua Franca. Archived from the original on May 29, Retrieved May 3, Reply by Alan Sokal. All Things Considered Interview. Interviewed by Robert Siegel. National Public Radio. Archived from the original on July 12, Retrieved April 5, In Editors of Lingua Francapp.
doi : JSTOR Retrieved September 15, Archived PDF from the original on June 9, Retrieved March 11, Archived from the original on September 4, Retrieved March 5, New Politics. Archived from the original on May 12, Times Higher Education.
March 13, Retrieved June 4, alan sokal hoax essay, Hopkins Impromptu: Following Jacques Derrida Through Theory's Empire. Archived from the original on November 30,
\
, time: 49:13What the New Sokal Hoax Reveals About Academia - The Atlantic
Essay about The Sokal Hoax. Words5 Pages. The Sokal Hoax In Fall of , New York University theoretical physicist, Alan Sokal, submitted an essay to Social Text, the leading journal in the field of cultural studies. This essay, entitled "Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity," pretended to be a scholarly article about Call it Sokal Squared. The result is hilarious and delightful. It also showcases a serious problem with big parts of academia. (Thread.) — Yascha Mounk (@Yascha_Mounk) October 3, The trio scaled-up operations to press out 20 hoax papers over a space of 10 months in parody of what they refer to as grievance blogger.comted Reading Time: 5 mins The hoax was his way of calling attention to this decline. In his article, Sokal attacks "the dogma imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual outlook" that there is an external world governed by laws of nature which we can understand imperfectly using the scientific method
No comments:
Post a Comment